![]() ![]() arguments against a particular interpretation of what Kant meant. Stated more simply, because Kant is no longer with us and his writing is fairly obtuse, even today it's not always clear whether some arguments regarding Kant's work are actually arguments against what Kant meant vs. However, in many of the instances where a particular critic will identify a short-coming with Kant's reasoning, about half the time someone will point out that such an interpretation of the text is false, and "what Kant really says" is actually correct. ![]() ![]() To answer your question: Yes, it has "survived the scrutiny of philosophers" over the ages since it was published, even though there are some sections which almost certainly do contain logical errors, or he comes to a conclusion which he shouldn't otherwise have been able to reach. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |